| Data Element |
Deficiencies |
| Office |
- For 5,196 cases, the office that made the criminal referral was not identified.
|
| Referral Number |
- For 3,486 cases, a referral number was not used.
|
| Referral Date |
- For 524 cases, the referral date was not identified.
|
| Referred By |
- For 2,985 cases, the source of the referral was not identified.
- There were 77 different descriptions use to identify the source of the referral such as narrative descriptions, acronyms, and abbreviations.
|
| Bankruptcy Number |
- For 1,542 cases, the bankruptcy number was identified.
|
| Debtor Name |
- For 1,168 cases, the debtor name was not identified.
|
| Chapter |
- For 1,839 cases, the type of chapter filed by the debtor was not identified.
|
| Allegations |
- For 358 cases, the type of allegation was not identified.
- To identify the type of allegation, there were 2,005 different descriptions such as narrative descriptions, acronyms, abbreviations and multiple allegations included in the same data field.
|
| Loss |
- For 5,472 cases, the loss was not identified.
|
| Subject Name |
- For 1,172 cases, the subject of the criminal referral was not identified.
|
| Subject Code |
- For 3,465 cases, the subject code was not identified.
- There were 119 different subject codes used because of the inconsistent use of acronyms and abbreviations.
|
| AUSA Assigned |
- For 6,148 cases, AUSA assigned to the cases were not identified.
|
| Date Declined |
- For 15 cases, the date the criminal referral was declined was not identified.
|
| Current Status |
- For 872 cases, the current status was not identified.
- There were 432 different descriptions used to provide the current status. This occurred because of the inconsistent use narrative descriptions, acronyms, and abbreviations.
|
| Date Indictment |
- For 18 cases, the date of the indictment date was identified.
|
| Indictment Code |
- For 321 cases, the indictment code was not identified.
- There were 238 different indictment codes used to describe type of indictment. This occurred primarily because of the inconsistent use criminal code citations, narrative descriptions, and the number of offenses.
|
| Date of Conviction |
- For 15 cases, the conviction date was not identified.
|
| Conviction Code |
- For 276 cases, the conviction code was not identified.
- There were 305 different conviction codes. This occurred primarily because of the inconsistent use criminal code citations, narrative descriptions, and the number of offenses.
|
| Statute of Limitations |
- For 7,554 cases, the date for the statute of limitations was not identified.
|