Small Grantees continued | Indian Tribes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sunflower County, MS | Talladega, AL | Union County, OR | Union City, GA | Victoria, TX | Washington County, VA | Watsonville, CA (PHS) | West, MS |
Willcox, AZ |
Yellowstone County, MT |
Cocopah Tribal Police, AZ |
Hoopa Valley, CA |
Iowa Tribe of KS and NE |
Kickapoo Tribe of OK |
Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, NV |
Mescalero Apache Tribe, NM |
Oglala Sioux, SD |
Red Lake, MN Chippewa Indians |
Rosebud Sioux, SD |
Sac and Fox, MO |
Standing Rock Sioux, ND |
Totals | |
Accounting System: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Internal Control Weaknesses |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 | |||||||
Requests for Federal Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Drew Down Excess Funds | * | * | * |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
25 | |||||
Earned Excess Interest |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 | |||||||
Declined Grant Award |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 | |||||||
Overestimated Salaries and Benefits on Grant Application | * |
|
|
|
NA |
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
20 | ||||||
Ineligible Officer(s) Charged to Grant | * |
|
* |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
16 |
||||||
Unallowable Grant Costs |
|
* | * | * | * |
|
* |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
74 |
|||
Officer Redeployment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Redeployment Tracking System/Did Not Document Redeployment | NA |
* |
NA |
* |
* |
* |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
52 |
Supplanting Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Budgeted Officers Decreased Below Baseline During Grant Period |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
* |
NA |
|
27 |
Paid for Officers Already on Board |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
7 |
Vacancies Not Filled Timely |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
* |
NA |
|
22 |
Matching Funds Already Budgeted for Law Enforcement Purposes/Match Not Supported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Not Providing Total Matching Funds |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
7 |
Retention Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Formal Plan | * |
|
* |
* |
|
* |
|
|
* |
* |
NA |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
NA |
* |
73 |
Would Not Retain Position |
|
* |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
13 |
COPS Monitoring Reports: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Report Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate | * |
* |
* |
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
* |
NA |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
77 |
Annual Report Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate |
|
* |
* |
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
NA |
|
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
NA |
* |
69 |
Officer Progress Reports Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate |
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
* |
* |
|
* |
NA |
|
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
NA |
* |
72 |
OJP Financial Status Reports: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Status Reports Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
NA |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
137 |
Community Policing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Policing Not Enhanced/Could Be Improved | * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
* |
|
* |
* |
|
* |
|
* |
30 |
Officers Temporarily Transferred to Other Assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Used Funds for Purposes Other Than Stated in Application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Totals | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 794 |
* | = | Serious Issue | Large Grantee = $4 million or more | |
* | = | Moderate Issue | Medium Grantee > $500,000 < $4 million | |
* | = | Minor Issue | Small Grantee =$500,000 or less | |
Blank Box | = | No Weakness | ||
NA | = | Not Applicable or Not Reviewed |