Appendix I - COPS Report Findings and Recommendations by Location
Small Grantees Continued/Indian Tribes
| Small Grantees continued | Indian Tribes | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunflower County, MS | Talladega, AL | Union County, OR | Union City, GA | Victoria, TX | Washington County, VA | Watsonville, CA (PHS) | West, MS | Willcox, AZ | Yellowstone County, MT | Cocopah Tribal Police, AZ | Hoopa Valley, CA | Iowa Tribe of KS and NE | Kickapoo Tribe of OK | Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, NV | Mescalero Apache Tribe, NM | Oglala Sioux, SD | Red Lake, MN Chippewa Indians | Rosebud Sioux, SD | Sac and Fox, MO | Standing Rock Sioux, ND | Totals | |
| Accounting System: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Internal Control Weaknesses | * | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Requests for Federal Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drew Down Excess Funds | * | * | * | NA | * | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
| Earned Excess Interest | NA | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Declined Grant Award | NA | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Overestimated Salaries and Benefits on Grant Application | * | NA | * | * | NA | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
| Ineligible Officer(s) Charged to Grant | * | * | NA | NA | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unallowable Grant Costs | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | 74 | |||||||||||
| Officer Redeployment: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| No Redeployment Tracking System/Did Not Document Redeployment | NA | * | NA | * | * | * | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52 | ||
| Supplanting Indicators: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Budgeted Officers Decreased Below Baseline During Grant Period | NA | NA | * | * | * | NA | 27 | |||||||||||||||
| Paid for Officers Already on Board | NA | NA | NA | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Vacancies Not Filled Timely | NA | NA | * | * | * | NA | 22 | |||||||||||||||
| Matching Funds Already Budgeted for Law Enforcement Purposes/Match Not Supported | NA | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Not Providing Total Matching Funds | * | NA | * | * | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
| Retention Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| No Formal Plan | * | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | 73 | ||||
| Would Not Retain Position | * | * | NA | NA | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
| COPS Monitoring Reports: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Initial Report Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate | * | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 77 | |||||||
| Annual Report Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | 69 | ||||||||
| Officer Progress Reports Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | 72 | ||||||||
| OJP Financial Status Reports: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Status Reports Not: Submitted/Timely/ Accurate | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 137 | |
| Community Policing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Policing Not Enhanced/Could Be Improved | * | NA | * | * | * | * | * | 30 | ||||||||||||||
| Officers Temporarily Transferred to Other Assignments | NA | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Used Funds for Purposes Other Than Stated in Application | NA | * | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Totals | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 794 |
*
= Serious Issue
Large Grantee = $4 million or more
*
= Moderate Issue
Medium Grantee > $500,000 < $4 million
*
= Minor Issue
Small Grantee =$500,000 or less
Blank Box = No Weakness
NA
=
Not Applicable or Not Reviewed