Appendix IV - Sheet 1
INTERNAL CONTROL DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY DISTRICT
TOTAL "X" |
NAL | MAL | SAL | AK | AZ | EAR | WAR | NCA | ECA | CCA | SCA | CO | CT | DC-SC | DC | DE | NFL | MFL | SFL | |
1. FEE AND COMMISSION COLLECTIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Did not attempt to collect from government corporations acting as receivers | 39 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Did not bill paupers after service provided | 73 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | CND | |||
2. TIME REPORTING | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded prisoner transportation activity in the PR time category | 7 | X | X | |||||||||||||||||
Recorded administrative activity in thePR time category | 82 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
3. MONTHLY REPORT OF PROCESS AND SEIZURES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported service of a writ, summons & complaint, and interrogatory as 1 process | 37 | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Reported service of a writ, summons & complaint, and interrogatory as 2 processes | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported service of a writ, summons & complaint, and interrogatory as 3 processes | 52 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Reported service of a writ, summons & complaint, and interrogatory as 4 processes or did not respond to the question | 3 | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Reported processes forwarded to another district as served by their own district | 34 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
Reported processes received from another district as served by their own district | 85 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
4. SEPARATION OF DUTIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Inadequately separated receiving duties from recording duties | 54 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | CND | X | CND | X | X | X | X | ||||
Inadequately separated disbursing duties from recording duties | 83 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Inadequately separated reconciling USM-286 folder to FMS | 91 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Inadequately separated reconciling receipts to deposits | 79 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
5. RECEIPTS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Did not maintain a log of receipts for both mailed-in and over-the-counter receipts | 29 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Did not restrictively endorse checks immediately upon receipt | 60 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Did not properly secure funds not deposited on the day received | 1 |
CND = Based on the district's answer, we could not determine if the district properly performed this function.
#####