|
Our web-based survey of state and local law enforcement agencies consisted of 37 questions, which were divided into separate sections. Specifically, some of the segments included questions related to the FBI’s investigative assistance, the impact of the FBI’s shift in priorities, the survey participants’ joint investigations with the FBI, and the level of FBI investigations in each participant’s jurisdiction. The remainder of this appendix provides the results of our survey, question-by-question.
FBI Investigative Assistance:
1. During calendar year 2000 (January through December 2000), how many times did your agency request criminal investigative assistance from the FBI?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| 0 times |
515 |
| 1 to 10 times |
630 |
| 11 to 25 times |
69 |
| 26 to 50 times |
15 |
| 51 to 100 times |
10 |
| More than 100 times |
13 |
| Total Responses |
1,252 |
2. During calendar year 2000, on what percentage of your agency’s requests was the FBI able to provide criminal investigative assistance?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| 0 times |
500 |
| 1 to 10 times |
200 |
| 11 to 25 times |
41 |
| 26 to 50 times |
65 |
| 51 to 100 times |
148 |
| More than 100 times |
279 |
| Total Responses |
1,233 |
3. During calendar year 2004 (January 2004 to the present), how many times did your agency request criminal investigative assistance from the FBI?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| 0 times |
480 |
| 1 to 10 times |
648 |
| 11 to 25 times |
60 |
| 26 to 50 times |
27 |
| 51 to 100 times |
14 |
| More than 100 times |
17 |
| Total Responses |
1,246 |
4. During calendar year 2004, on what percentage of your agency’s requests was the FBI able to provide criminal investigative assistance?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| 0 times |
481 |
| 1 to 10 times |
178 |
| 11 to 25 times |
45 |
| 26 to 50 times |
72 |
| 51 to 100 times |
148 |
| More than 100 times |
305 |
| Total Responses |
1,229 |
Impact of FBI’s Shift in Priorities:
Questions 5 through 8 asked respondents to indicate the impact the FBI’s shift in priorities had on their investigative operations for certain investigative areas. For each of these questions, respondents were provided with a scaled response ranging from -5 (Very Negative Impact) to +5 (Very Positive Impact). Specifically, an answer of “-5” indicated that an agency had been significantly impaired by the FBI’s shift in priorities. For example, an agency experienced severe difficulty in handling the type of investigation listed. In contrast, a response of “+5” signified that an agency had benefited from the FBI’s shift in priorities, such as an agency significantly enhancing its operations to successfully address the investigative area in question. An answer of “0” indicated that an agency had continued to operate as it had prior to the FBI’s reprioritization and had experienced no change. Finally, a reply of “N/A” denoted that the agency had no involvement in a particular investigative area during the last three years.
5. What impact, if any, has the FBI’s shift in priorities during the last three years had on your agency’s law enforcement efforts in addressing each of the following types of investigations?
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Computer Crime
Investigations |
Drug
Investigations |
Organized Crime
Investigations |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
12 |
9 |
11 |
| -4 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
| -3 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
| -2 |
24 |
16 |
19 |
| -1 |
31 |
25 |
20 |
| 0 |
747 |
831 |
738 |
| 1 |
38 |
31 |
22 |
| 2 |
27 |
22 |
19 |
| 3 |
36 |
31 |
23 |
| 4 |
16 |
14 |
8 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
37 |
17 |
11 |
| N/A |
253 |
225 |
344 |
| Total Responses |
1,234 |
1,238 |
1,238 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Terrorism-Related
Investigations |
Violent Crime
Investigations |
White-Collar Crime
Investigations |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
4 |
5 |
9 |
| -4 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
| -3 |
1 |
13 |
21 |
| -2 |
4 |
18 |
32 |
| -1 |
4 |
27 |
34 |
| 0 |
542 |
792 |
747 |
| 1 |
60 |
31 |
37 |
| 2 |
78 |
34 |
41 |
| 3 |
83 |
35 |
31 |
| 4 |
59 |
19 |
14 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
117 |
23 |
18 |
| N/A |
279 |
234 |
237 |
| Total Responses |
1,234 |
1,236 |
1,231 |
6. What impact, if any, has the FBI’s shift in priorities during the last three years had on your agency’s law enforcement efforts in addressing each of the following violent crime areas?
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Bank Robberies |
Crimes Against
Children |
Fugitives |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
11 |
3 |
3 |
| -4 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
| -3 |
28 |
4 |
6 |
| -2 |
35 |
6 |
17 |
| -1 |
46 |
19 |
32 |
| 0 |
692 |
850 |
774 |
| 1 |
20 |
26 |
43 |
| 2 |
13 |
9 |
31 |
| 3 |
21 |
21 |
28 |
| 4 |
16 |
13 |
18 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
37 |
19 |
23 |
| N/A |
305 |
254 |
250 |
| Total Responses |
1,232 |
1,225 |
1,227 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Gangs |
Hate Crime |
Interstate
Transportation of
Stolen Motor
Vehicles |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
1 |
1 |
5 |
| -4 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
| -3 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
| -2 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
| -1 |
23 |
14 |
18 |
| 0 |
764 |
809 |
763 |
| 1 |
29 |
21 |
21 |
| 2 |
27 |
18 |
11 |
| 3 |
15 |
12 |
11 |
| 4 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
12 |
8 |
6 |
| N/A |
337 |
324 |
363 |
| Total Responses |
1,230 |
1,219 |
1,227 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Interstate
Transportation of
Stolen Property |
Major Theft
(>$10,000) |
Motor Vehicle Theft |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
6 |
9 |
4 |
| -4 |
5 |
11 |
5 |
| -3 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
| -2 |
9 |
14 |
6 |
| -1 |
24 |
34 |
26 |
| 0 |
773 |
803 |
869 |
| 1 |
18 |
20 |
19 |
| 2 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
| 3 |
10 |
10 |
6 |
| 4 |
4 |
9 |
5 |
| 5 (Very Positive Impact) |
9 |
8 |
5 |
| N/A |
353 |
292 |
267 |
| Total Responses |
1,227 |
1,226 |
1,225 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Theft From
Interstate
Shipment |
Violent Crimes
Against Persons |
-5 (Very Negative
Impact) |
5 |
5 |
| -4 |
4 |
5 |
| -3 |
3 |
9 |
| -2 |
4 |
6 |
| -1 |
21 |
31 |
| 0 |
752 |
818 |
| 1 |
14 |
31 |
| 2 |
7 |
26 |
| 3 |
5 |
19 |
| 4 |
5 |
9 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
2 |
23 |
| N/A |
404 |
242 |
| Total Responses |
1,226 |
1,224 |
7. What impact, if any, has the FBI’s shift in priorities during the last three years had on your agency’s law enforcement efforts in addressing each of the following white-collar crime areas?
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Environmental
Crimes |
Financial
Institution Fraud
(< than $100,000) |
Financial
Institution Fraud
(> than $100,000) |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
3 |
7 |
3 |
| -4 |
2 |
10 |
7 |
| -3 |
1 |
16 |
8 |
| -2 |
2 |
22 |
17 |
| -1 |
10 |
46 |
23 |
| 0 |
747 |
744 |
730 |
| 1 |
12 |
31 |
17 |
| 2 |
8 |
21 |
13 |
| 3 |
2 |
13 |
7 |
| 4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
| 5 (Very Positive Impact) |
3 |
11 |
8 |
| N/A |
437 |
299 |
394 |
| Total Responses |
1,228 |
1,223 |
1,228 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Insurance Fraud |
Identity Theft |
Mortgage Fraud |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
3 |
12 |
5 |
| -4 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
| -3 |
7 |
21 |
2 |
| -2 |
12 |
37 |
4 |
| -1 |
21 |
49 |
18 |
| 0 |
800 |
711 |
755 |
| 1 |
18 |
63 |
11 |
| 2 |
7 |
40 |
1 |
| 3 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
| 4 |
3 |
7 |
2 |
| 5 (Very Positive Impact) |
6 |
17 |
3 |
| N/A |
349 |
236 |
418 |
| Total Responses |
1,229 |
1,226 |
1,221 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Public Corruption |
Telemarketing and
Wire Fraud |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
3 |
12 |
| -4 |
2 |
2 |
| -3 |
5 |
11 |
| -2 |
4 |
28 |
| -1 |
12 |
28 |
| 0 |
750 |
729 |
| 1 |
16 |
36 |
| 2 |
6 |
17 |
| 3 |
5 |
11 |
| 4 |
4 |
6 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
6 |
10 |
| N/A |
409 |
334 |
| Total Responses |
1,222 |
1,224 |
8. What impact, if any, has the FBI’s shift in priorities during the last three years had on your agency’s law enforcement efforts in addressing each of the following types of organized crime/drug organizations?
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
African
Organizations |
Asian
Organizations |
Caribbean
Organizations |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
3 |
2 |
2 |
| -4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| -3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
| -2 |
14 |
4 |
3 |
| -1 |
14 |
14 |
6 |
| 0 |
676 |
685 |
683 |
| 1 |
13 |
22 |
15 |
| 2 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
| 3 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
| 4 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
| 5 (Very Positive Impact) |
6 |
5 |
2 |
| N/A |
479 |
468 |
496 |
| Total Responses |
1,223 |
1,224 |
1,220 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Central/South
American
Organizations |
Eurasian and
Russian
Organizations |
La Cosa Nostra/
Italian
Organizations |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
2 |
3 |
3 |
| -4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| -3 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
| -2 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
| -1 |
14 |
17 |
10 |
| 0 |
683 |
684 |
685 |
| 1 |
23 |
16 |
9 |
| 2 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
| 3 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
| 4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
| 5 (Very Positive Impact) |
10 |
5 |
1 |
| N/A |
468 |
473 |
501 |
| Total Responses |
1,222 |
1,225 |
1,223 |
| |
Number of Responses |
Available
Answer |
Mexican
Organizations |
Other Major
Criminal
Organizations |
| -5 (Very Negative Impact) |
5 |
3 |
| -4 |
4 |
3 |
| -3 |
8 |
5 |
| -2 |
16 |
8 |
| -1 |
26 |
23 |
| 0 |
665 |
715 |
| 1 |
31 |
17 |
| 2 |
8 |
6 |
| 3 |
14 |
12 |
| 4 |
4 |
4 |
5 (Very Positive
Impact) |
14 |
10 |
| N/A |
429 |
415 |
| Total Responses |
1,224 |
1,221 |
Joint (Non-Task Force) Investigations with the FBI:
9. During calendar year 2000, approximately how many joint (non-task force) investigations did your agency work with the FBI?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| 0 investigations |
661 |
| 1 to 10 investigations |
502 |
| 11 to 25 investigations |
37 |
| 26 to 50 investigations |
9 |
| 51 to 100 investigations |
6 |
| More than 100 investigations |
4 |
| Total Responses |
1,219 |
10. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, rate the change, if any, in the number of your agency’s joint (non-task force investigations with the FBI.
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| Significant decrease (greater than 25%) |
51 |
| Moderate decrease (10% to 25%) |
34 |
| Slight decrease (less than 10%) |
50 |
| No change |
922 |
| Slight increase (less than 10%) |
88 |
| Moderate increase (10% to 25%) |
43 |
| Significant increase (greater than 25%) |
24 |
| Total Responses |
1,212 |
11. During calendar year 2000, approximately how many joint (non-task force) investigations did your agency work with the FBI in each of the following general investigative areas?
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Computer Crime Investigations |
Drug Investigations |
Organized Crime Investigations |
| 0 |
894 |
889 |
1,030 |
| 1-10 |
276 |
267 |
141 |
| 11-25 |
11 |
17 |
4 |
| 26-50 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
| 50-100 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| More than 100 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
| Total Responses |
1,190 |
1,189 |
1,181 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Terrorism Related Investigations |
Violent Crime Investigations |
White-Collar Crime Investigations |
| 0 |
1,006 |
895 |
896 |
| 1-10 |
149 |
255 |
265 |
| 11-25 |
10 |
19 |
11 |
| 26-50 |
2 |
8 |
3 |
| 50-100 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
| More than 100 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
| Total Responses |
1,174 |
1,187 |
1,180 |
12. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, rate the change, if any, in the number of your agency’s joint (non-task force) investigations with the FBI in each of the following general investigative areas.
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Computer
Crime |
Drug
Investigations |
Organized Crime
Investigations |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
14 |
30 |
14 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%‑25%) |
17 |
18 |
11 |
Slight Decrease
(< 10%) |
42 |
33 |
27 |
| No Change |
1,004 |
1,041 |
1,087 |
Slight Increase
(< 10%) |
69 |
41 |
31 |
Moderate Increase
(10%-25%) |
32 |
23 |
11 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
10 |
6 |
3 |
| Total Responses |
1,188 |
1,192 |
1,184 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Terrorism Related Investigations |
Violent Crime Investigations |
White-Collar Crime Investigations |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
7 |
12 |
16 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%-25%) |
0 |
15 |
13 |
Slight Decrease
(< 10%) |
8 |
40 |
41 |
| No Change |
948 |
1,035 |
1,048 |
Slight Increase
(< 10%) |
117 |
61 |
58 |
| Moderate Increase (10%-25%) |
57 |
15 |
9 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
50 |
9 |
3 |
| Total Responses |
1,187 |
1,187 |
1,188 |
Level of FBI Investigations in Your Agency’s Jurisdiction:
13. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, rate the change, if any, you have observed in the level of investigations conducted by the FBI in your agency’s jurisdiction in each of the following general investigative areas.
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Computer Crimes Investigations |
Drug Investigations |
Organized Crime Investigations |
| Decrease |
58 |
82 |
37 |
| No Change |
887 |
896 |
947 |
| Increase |
113 |
76 |
46 |
| Uncertain |
148 |
150 |
171 |
| Total Responses |
1,206 |
1,204 |
1,201 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Terrorism Related Investigations |
Violent Crime Investigations |
White-Collar Crime Investigations |
| Decrease |
3 |
58 |
63 |
| No Change |
769 |
934 |
914 |
| Increase |
307 |
70 |
61 |
| Uncertain |
124 |
138 |
158 |
| Total Responses |
1,203 |
1,200 |
1,196 |
Availability of FBI Training:
14. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, what level of change, if any, has your agency experienced in the availability of FBI training in the following areas?
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Counterterrorism Related Training |
Traditional Crime Related Training |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
7 |
27 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%‑25%) |
10 |
49 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
16 |
58 |
| No Change |
487 |
708 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
146 |
96 |
| Moderate Increase (10%‑25%) |
186 |
60 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
175 |
32 |
| Not Applicable |
182 |
183 |
| Total Responses |
1,209 |
1,213 |
Joint-Investigative Efforts with Other Federal Law Enforcement Agencies:
15. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, rate the change, if any, in the number of joint (non-task force) investigations between your agency and the following federal law enforcement agencies.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (ATF)
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) |
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
U.S. Marshals Service (USMS)
U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS)
U.S. Secret Service (USSS) |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
ATF |
ICE |
CBP |
HHS |
DEA |
IRS |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
8 |
10 |
14 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%-25%) |
11 |
7 |
13 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
19 |
9 |
23 |
7 |
41 |
14 |
| No Change |
641 |
697 |
620 |
748 |
616 |
753 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
224 |
92 |
174 |
39 |
173 |
73 |
| Moderate Increase (10%-25%) |
68 |
33 |
74 |
15 |
95 |
14 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
38 |
25 |
38 |
2 |
43 |
1 |
| N/A |
198 |
328 |
254 |
380 |
219 |
334 |
| Total Responses |
1,207 |
1,201 |
1,210 |
1,197 |
1,203 |
1,198 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
USMS |
USPIS |
USSS |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
1 |
3 |
3 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%-25%) |
4 |
4 |
12 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
14 |
22 |
19 |
| No Change |
686 |
650 |
659 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
129 |
186 |
180 |
| Moderate Increase (10%-25%) |
53 |
72 |
73 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
28 |
30 |
26 |
| N/A |
282 |
234 |
230 |
| Total Responses |
1,197 |
1,201 |
1,202 |
16. During calendar year 2000, if your agency participated in any of the following federal task forces, approximately how many of your agency’s officers (Full-Time Equivalents) were assigned each task force and approximately how many investigations did the task force handle?
Text Response – No summary available
17. During calendar year 2004, if your agency participated in any of the following federal task forces, approximately how many of your agency’s officers (Full-Time Equivalents) were assigned each task force and approximately how many investigations did the task force handle?
Text Response – No summary available
18. Besides those federal task forces noted in Question 17, are there any other federal task forces that your agency participated in during calendar year 2004 but not during calendar year 2000?
Text Response – No summary available
General Questions About Your Agency:
19. What type of agency do you represent?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| Police Department |
942 |
| Sheriff’s Department |
206 |
| State Law Enforcement Agency |
28 |
| Tribal Law Enforcement Agency |
9 |
Other (e.g., airport, railroad, harbor)
(Please specify) |
32 |
| Total Responses |
1,217 |
20. As of January 1, 2000, how many sworn (on-board) officers did your agency have?
Text Response – No summary available
21. As of November 1, 2004, how many sworn (on-board) officers did your agency have?
Text Response – No summary available
22. Per the 2000 Census, what was the size of the population your agency represented?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| Less than 20,000 residents |
711 |
| 20,000 to 50,000 residents |
221 |
| 50,001 to 100,000 residents |
94 |
| 100,001 to 250,000 residents |
80 |
| Over 250,000 residents |
91 |
| Total Responses |
1,197 |
23. Compared to the 2000 Census, rate the change, if any, in the size of the population that your agency currently represents.
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| Significant decrease (> than 15%) |
16 |
| Moderate decrease (5%-15%) |
46 |
| Slight decrease (< than 5%) |
113 |
| No change |
312 |
| Slight increase (< than 5%) |
379 |
| Moderate increase (5%-15%) |
230 |
| Significant increase (> than 15%) |
98 |
| Total Responses |
1,194 |
24. As of January 1, 2000, approximately how much was your agency’s annual law enforcement budget, including federal financial assistance?
Text Response – No summary available
25. As of January 1, 2000, approximately how much federal financial assistance did your agency receive for law enforcement matters?
Text Response – No summary available
26. As of January 1, 2004, approximately how much was your agency’s annual law enforcement budget, including federal financial assistance?
Text Response – No summary available
27. As of January 1, 2004, approximately how much federal financial assistance did your agency receive for law enforcement matters?
Text Response – No summary available
28. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, how significant was the change in the overall crime rate that occurred within your agency’s jurisdiction?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses |
| Very significant decrease (more than 25%) |
18 |
| Moderately significant decrease (10%‑25%) |
99 |
| Slightly significant decrease (0‑10%) |
228 |
| No change |
183 |
| Slightly significant increase (0‑10%) |
383 |
| Moderately significant increase (10%‑25%) |
159 |
| Very significant increase (more than 25%) |
39 |
| Total Responses |
1,109 |
29. Comparing calendar years 2000 to 2004, rate the change, if any, in the number of crimes experienced within your jurisdiction for each of the following categories.
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Bank Robberies |
Computer Crimes |
Drug Crimes |
Gang Related Crimes |
Significant Decrease
(> 25%) |
23 |
6 |
14 |
8 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%-25%) |
16 |
6 |
22 |
11 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
64 |
23 |
64 |
58 |
| No Change |
502 |
289 |
277 |
499 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
132 |
343 |
326 |
164 |
| Moderate Increase (10%-25%) |
27 |
169 |
248 |
72 |
Significant Increase
(> 25%) |
22 |
75 |
97 |
20 |
| N/A |
295 |
165 |
35 |
243 |
| Total Responses |
1,081 |
1,076 |
1,083 |
1,075 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Hate Crimes |
Major Thefts |
Organized Crime |
Public Corruption |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
12 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
| Moderate Decrease (10%-25%) |
7 |
30 |
3 |
3 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
26 |
96 |
14 |
19 |
| No Change |
657 |
408 |
596 |
581 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
75 |
301 |
66 |
55 |
| Moderate Increase (10%-25%) |
16 |
126 |
14 |
12 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
7 |
30 |
3 |
1 |
| N/A |
279 |
77 |
378 |
406 |
| Total Responses |
1,079 |
1,075 |
1,076 |
1,078 |
| |
Number of Responses |
| Available Answer |
Violent Crimes
Against Persons |
White-Collar
Crime |
| Significant Decrease (> 25%) |
21 |
2 |
Moderate Decrease
(10%-25%) |
41 |
7 |
| Slight Decrease (< 10%) |
134 |
37 |
| No Change |
382 |
506 |
| Slight Increase (< 10%) |
321 |
217 |
Moderate Increase
(10%-25%) |
98 |
80 |
| Significant Increase (> 25%) |
25 |
42 |
| N/A |
60 |
180 |
| Total Responses |
1,082 |
1,071 |
30. In what FBI field office jurisdiction is your agency located?
| Available Answer |
Number of
Responses79 |
| Atlanta |
174 |
| Chicago |
205 |
| Dallas |
205 |
| Denver |
107 |
| Detroit |
218 |
| Los Angeles |
77 |
| Miami |
36 |
| New Orleans |
76 |
| New York City |
73 |
| Phoenix |
46 |
| San Francisco |
75 |
| Washington, D.C. |
20 |
| Total Responses |
1,312 |
31. With which FBI Resident Agency (RA) does your agency primarily work?
Text Response – No summary available
Additional Comments:
32. Describe the specific areas (if any) in which the FBI during the past three years changed the level of its: (1) working relationship with your agency, (2) information sharing with your agency, or (3) investigative assistance or support provided to your agency. In particular, consider the following areas when addressing your response: Organized Crime, Drugs, Violent Gangs, White-Collar Crime, Violent Crime, and Bank Robberies.
Text Response – No summary available
33. If possible, please provide specific examples or data that your agency may have to support your response to Question 32.
Text Response – No summary available
34. Describe the impact that the changes described in Question 32 have had on your agency’s ability to address criminal activity in your jurisdiction.
Text Response – No summary available
35. If applicable, please provide specific instances in which the FBI was unable to provide investigative assistance to your agency when it was requested over the past three years.
Text Response – No summary available
36. Describe the nature and extent of your law enforcement responsibilities, particularly in the following areas: Organized Crime, Drugs, Violent Gangs, White-Collar Crime, Violent Crime, and Bank Robberies.
Text Response – No summary available
37. What other comments would you like to provide that were not addressed in this survey?
Text Response – No summary available
- As previously noted, we received multiple responses from the same agency on a few occasions. The figures in this table reflect the actual number of responses received, including the multiple responses.
|
