The Drug Enforcement Administration’s Handling of Cash Seizures

Audit Report 07-06
January 2007
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix VI
Presence of a Witnessing Agent or Officer
at Various Stages of the Cash Handling Process56

[Images Are Not Available Electronically]

Offices Tested:
Washington Division
Detroit Division
Houston Division
Los Angeles Division
Miami Division
New Orleans Division
New York Division

 Source: OIG analysis of DEA records



Footnotes
  1. “Yes” means documentation showed the name of the witnessing agent or officer who was present or involved. “No” means documentation showed the name of only one agent or officer who was present or involved. “Could not determine” means the documentation did not provide sufficient information to confirm whether a witnessing agent or officer was present or involved.



« Previous Table of Contents Next »