The Drug Enforcement Administrationís Handling of Cash Seizures

Audit Report 07-06
January 2007
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix IV
Counting Seized Cash
(By Division/Office)54

Washington Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: Washington Division Office-33/17/50; Baltimore District Office-14/0/86; Richmond District Office-0/0/100; Norfolk Resident Office-50/0/50.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records

Detroit Division Pecentages-Yes/No: Detroit Division Office-0/100; Columbus District Office-11/89; Cleveland Resident Office-0/100; Dayton Resident Office-0/100.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records


Houston Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: Houston Division Office-34/22/44; McAllen District Office-34/33/33; Brownsville Resident Office-25/0/75; Austin Resident Office-0/0/100.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records

Los Angeles Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: Los Angeles Division Office-63/3/34; Riverside District Office-0/4/96; Ventura Resident Office-0/0/100.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records


Miami Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: Miami Division Office-0/50/50; Ft. Lauderdale District Office-15/14/71; Orlando District Office-5/78/17; Tampa District Office-6/81/13; West Palm Beach Resident Office-0/33/67.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records


New Orleans Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: Birmingham District Office-31/10/59; Montgomery District Office-31/19/50; Oxford Resident Office-22/11/67.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records


New York Division Pecentages-Yes/Could not determine/No: New York Division Office-7/0/93; Long Island District Office-12/12/76; New York Task Force Office-7/0/93; John F. Kennedy Airport Office-0/0/100; Syracuse Resident Office-0/7/93.
Source: OIG analysis of DEA records



Footnotes
  1. As for the counting of seized cash, “Yes” means documentation showed the seized cash was counted, “No” means documentation showed the seized cash was not counted, and “Could not determine” means the documentation did not provide sufficient information to confirm whether the seized cash was counted.



« Previous Table of Contents Next »