Return to the USDOJ/OIG Home Page
Return to the Table of Contents

The Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Release Preparation and Transitional Reentry Programs

Report No. 04-16
March 2004
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix VIII
Analysis of the Parenting Goals and Outcomes
FY 2001 Through FY 2002

For the institutions included in our audit, we reviewed the parenting goals and outcomes for FY 1999 through FY 2002 reported in each institution's Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services. (The BOP did not require its institutions to establish parenting goals for FY 2002 because of a change in the format of the Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services; however, we used the FY 2002 parenting projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services as the FY 2002 parenting goals for our analysis.)

The following schedules provide the details of our analysis of the parenting goals and outcomes reported by each institution in its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services for FY 2001 through FY 2002. Those institutions for which the parenting goal and/or outcome is shown as "---" in the following schedules did not include a goal and/or outcome in their Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services. Further, unless noted otherwise, those institutions for which the parenting goal and/or outcome is shown as "N/A" did not submit an Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was not open and/or fully operational during the fiscal year.

Parenting Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2001
Institution Security Level Goal75 Outcome Percent of Parenting
Goal Achieved76
FPC Nellis Minimum 20 167 835.00%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 25 61 244.00%
FPC Eglin Minimum 25 44 176.00%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 20 33 165.00%
FPC Montgomery Minimum 30 37 123.33%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 200 230 115.00%
FPC Bryan Minimum 500 547 109.40%
FPC Alderson Minimum 900 811 90.11%
FPC Duluth Minimum 80 62 77.50%
FPC Yankto Minimum 75 50 66.67%
FPC Allenwood Minimum 200 102 51.00%
FCI Butner Low 30 54 180.00%
FCI Safford Low 50 88 176.00%
FCI Dublin Low 500 797 159.40%
FCI Sandstone Low 150 221 147.33%
FCI Bastrop Low 220 318 144.55%
FCI Allenwood Low 170 228 134.12%
FCI Waseca Low 70 81 115.71%
FCI Texarkana Low 70 74 105.71%
FCI Petersburg Low 90 94 104.44%
FCI Milan Low 95 96 101.05%
FCI Lompoc Low 375 367 97.87%
FCI Beaumont Low 195 189 96.92%
FCI Big Spring Low 180 159 88.33%
FCI Loretto Low 125 110 88.00%
FCI La Tuna Low 220 183 83.18%
FCI Danbury Low 100 78 78.00%
FCI Forrest City Low 240 167 69.58%
FCI Yazoo City Low 100 65 65.00%
FCI Tallahassee Low 50 31 62.00%
FCI Elkton Low 110 51 46.36%
FCI Seagoville Low 55 21 38.18%
FCI Fort Dix Low 120 45 37.50%
FCI Ashland Low 600 180 30.00%
FCI Oakdale Medium 50 219 438.00%
FCI Marianna Medium 75 271 361.33%
FCI Florence Medium 85 173 203.53%
FCI Miami Medium 100 176 176.00%
FCI Cumberland Medium 200 343 171.50%
FCI McKean Medium 300 500 166.67%
FCI Allenwood Medium 150 208 138.67%
FCI Victorville Medium 150 208 138.67%
FCI Memphis Medium 173 216 124.86%
FCI Butner Medium 90 99 110.00%
FCI Manchester Medium 100 108 108.00%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 75 77 102.67%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 250 253 101.20%
FCI Englewood Medium 60 57 95.00%
FCI Oxford Medium 65 61 93.85%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 120 110 91.67%
FCI Phoenix Medium 80 67 83.75%
FCI Otisville Medium 300 243 81.00%
FCI Beckley Medium 100 75 75.00%
FCI Tucson Medium 60 45 75.00%
FCI Beaumont Medium 150 107 71.33%
FCI Pekin Medium 300 209 69.67%
FCI Jesup Medium 120 83 69.17%
FCI Sheridan Medium 120 83 69.17%
FCI Greenville Medium 65 44 67.69%
FCI Edgefield Medium 150 100 66.67%
FCI Fairton Medium 250 139 55.60%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 35 15 42.86%
FCI Talladega Medium 70 29 41.43%
FCI Estill Medium 125 19 15.20%
FCI El Reno Medium --- 78 ------
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Terre Haute High 25 69 276.00%
USP Florence High 30 45 150.00%
USP Marion High 30 42 140.00%
USP Lompoc High 30 37 123.33%
USP Lewisburg High 350 401 114.57%
USP Beaumont High 60 65 108.33%
USP Allenwood High 200 200 100.00%
USP Leavenworth High 50 42 84.00%
USP Atlanta High 100 67 67.00%
USP Pollock High N/A 20 ------
USP Atwater High N/A N/A ------
USP Lee High N/A N/A ------
ADX Florence Maximum 20 12 60.00%
FCC Coleman N/A77 200 260 130.00%




Parenting Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2002
Institution Security Level Goal78 Outcome Percent of Parenting
Goal Achieved79
FPC Alderson Minimum 200 297 148.50%
FPC Yankton Minimum 88 90 102.27%
FPC Duluth Minimum 70 63 90.00%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 55 47 85.45%
FPC Eglin Minimum 46 32 69.57%
FPC Bryan Minimum 600 339 56.50%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 200 83 41.50%
FPC Nellis Minimum 167 55 32.93%
FPC Montgomery Minimum --- 30 ------
FPC Pensacola Minimum --- 20 ------
FPC Allenwood Minimum 85 N/A80 ------
FCI Fort Dix Low 92 172 186.96%
FCI Petersburg Low 94 152 161.70%
FCI Elkton Low 75 116 154.67%
FCI Tallahassee Low 40 61 152.50%
FCI Yazoo City Low 70 103 147.14%
FCI Ashland Low 447 641 143.40%
FCI Waseca Low 81 113 139.51%
FCI Loretto Low 60 83 138.33%
FCI Safford Low 50 60 120.00%
FCI Sandstone Low 200 235 117.50%
FCI Texarkana Low 48 55 114.58%
FCI Big Spring Low 160 161 100.63%
FCI Lompoc Low 400 368 92.00%
FCI Allenwood Low 230 205 89.13%
FCI Butner Low 60 50 83.33%
FCI Dublin Low 600 492 82.00%
FCI Bastrop Low 330 252 76.36%
FCI La Tuna Low 225 153 68.00%
FCI Beaumont Low 200 129 64.50%
FCI Danbury Low 80 47 58.75%
FCI Milan Low 105 61 58.10%
FCI Forrest City Low 180 104 57.78%
FCI Seagoville Low 40 21 52.50%
FCI Fairton Medium 150 905 603.33%
FCI Otisville Medium 100 350 350.00%
FCI Sheridan Medium 25 75 300.00%
FCI El Reno Medium 125 353 282.40%
FCI Jesup Medium 97 213 219.59%
FCI Phoenix Medium 50 101 202.00%
FCI Estill Medium 40 78 195.00%
FCI Marianna Medium 125 226 180.80%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 64 112 175.00%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 120 206 171.67%
FCI Greenville Medium 72 102 141.67%
FCI Victorville Medium 180 247 137.22%
FCI McKean Medium 364 408 112.09%
FCI Allenwood Medium 125 131 104.80%
FCI Florence Medium 160 165 103.13%
FCI Oakdale Medium 96 96 100.00%
FCI Beckley Medium 144 129 89.58%
FCI Cumberland Medium 400 343 85.75%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 30 25 83.33%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 275 228 82.91%
FCI Talladega Medium 60 43 71.67%
FCI Butner Medium 196 139 70.92%
FCI Beaumont Medium 115 80 69.57%
FCI Englewood Medium 60 40 66.67%
FCI Edgefield Medium 172 113 65.70%
FCI Manchester Medium 110 71 64.55%
FCI Miami Medium 150 37 24.67%
FCI Tucson Medium 30 7 23.33%
FCI Pekin Medium --- 197 ------
FCI Memphis Medium --- 144 ------
FCI Oxford Medium --- 66 ------
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Terre Haute High 60 97 161.67%
USP Lewisburg High 350 449 128.29%
USP Allenwood High 200 243 121.50%
USP Atlanta High 75 87 116.00%
USP Pollock High 80 80 100.00%
USP Lompoc High 45 39 86.67%
USP Marion High 75 63 84.00%
USP Beaumont High 72 59 81.94%
USP Florence High 28 7 25.00%
USP Atwater High 10 0 0.00%
USP Lee High N/A 56 ------
USP Leavenworth High --- 28 ------
ADX Florence Maximum 20 48 240.00%
FCC Coleman N/A81 250 144 57.60%


Footnotes
  1. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2001 goals reported in the FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  2. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  3. The FY 2001 parenting goals for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2001 parenting outcomes were combined in a single FY 2001 report.
  4. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Further, the BOP did not require its institutions to establish goals for FY 2002. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2002 projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  5. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  6. The FPC Allenwood did not submit a FY 2002 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was merged with FCI Allenwood (Medium) in FY 2002.
  7. The FY 2002 parenting projected outcomes for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2002 parenting outcomes were combined in a single FY 2002 report.