Return to the USDOJ/OIG Home Page
Return to the Table of Contents

The Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Release Preparation and Transitional Reentry Programs

Report No. 04-16
March 2004
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix V
Analysis of the GED Goals and Outcomes
FY 2001

For the institutions included in our audit, we reviewed the GED goals and outcomes for FY 1999 through FY 2001 reported in each institution’s Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  (The BOP did not require its institutions to establish GED goals for FY 2002 because of a change in the GED testing format that was implemented at the beginning of calendar year 2002.)

The following schedule provides the details of our analysis of the GED goals and outcomes reported by each institution in its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services for FY 2001.  Those institutions for which the GED goal and/or outcome is shown as “---“ in the following schedules did not include a goal and/or outcome in their Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  Further, unless noted otherwise, those institutions for which the GED goal and/or outcome is shown as “N/A“ did not submit an Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was not open and/or fully operational during the fiscal year.

GED Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2001
Institution Security Level Goal58 Outcome Percent of GED Goal Achieved59
FPC Nellis Minimum 35 63 180.00%
FPC Eglin Minimum 30 46 153.33%
FPC Alderson Minimum 50 71 142.00%
FPC Montgomery Minimum 56 59 105.36%
FPC Bryan Minimum 120 121 100.83%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 35 34 97.14%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 70 64 91.43%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 40 35 87.50%
FPC Duluth Minimum 60 51 85.00%
FPC Yankton Minimum 60 45 75.00%
FPC Allenwood Minimum 125 48 38.40%
FCI Loretto Low 55 89 161.82%
FCI Texarkana Low 50 80 160.00%
FCI Butner Low 50 66 132.00%
FCI Elkton Low 77 97 125.97%
FCI Bastrop Low 45 54 120.00%
FCI Sandstone Low 40 46 115.00%
FCI Petersburg Low 40 45 112.50%
FCI Safford Low 70 78 111.43%
FCI Tallahassee Low 80 89 111.25%
FCI Lompoc Low 120 133 110.83%
FCI Seagoville Low 45 47 104.44%
FCI Dublin Low 75 77 102.67%
FCI Forrest City Low 150 147 98.00%
FCI Waseca Low 90 88 97.78%
FCI Allenwood Low 70 66 94.29%
FCI Yazoo City Low 85 75 88.24%
FCI Fort Dix Low 240 200 83.33%
FCI Beaumont Low 75 60 80.00%
FCI La Tuna Low 110 86 78.18%
FCI Milan Low 100 78 78.00%
FCI Big Spring Low 50 37 74.00%
FCI Ashland Low 100 70 70.00%
FCI Danbury Low 100 29 29.00%
FCI Tucson Medium 5 53 1,060.00%
FCI Miami Medium 40 92 230.00%
FCI Talladega Medium 65 97 149.23%
FCI El Reno Medium 75 111 148.00%
FCI Cumberland Medium 60 82 136.67%
FCI Florence Medium 110 149 135.45%
FCI Marianna Medium 50 66 132.00%
FCI Sheridan Medium 80 104 130.00%
FCI Oakdale Medium 35 45 128.57%
FCI Greenville Medium 80 99 123.75%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 70 85 121.43%
FCI Estill Medium 50 59 118.00%
FCI Fairton Medium 50 58 116.00%
FCI Beckley Medium 110 122 110.91%
FCI McKean Medium 75 83 110.67%
FCI Allenwood Medium 60 64 106.67%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 65 69 106.15%
FCI Pekin Medium 70 74 105.71%
FCI Manchester Medium 120 125 104.17%
FCI Oxford Medium 65 65 100.00%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 75 75 100.00%
FCI Victorville Medium 65 65 100.00%
FCI Phoenix Medium 75 73 97.33%
FCI Jesup Medium 85 81 95.29%
FCI Memphis Medium 146 134 91.78%
FCI Edgefield Medium 70 63 90.00%
FCI Butner Medium 60 51 85.00%
FCI Englewood Medium 50 39 78.00%
FCI Otisville Medium 100 74 74.00%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 100 62 62.00%
FCI Beaumont Medium 90 53 58.89%
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Terre Haute High 30 90 300.00%
USP Allenwood High 25 29 116.00%
USP Beaumont High 20 21 105.00%
USP Leavenworth High 80 84 105.00%
USP Atlanta High 100 100 100.00%
USP Marion High 33 31 93.94%
USP Florence High 32 27 84.38%
USP Lewisburg High 90 67 74.44%
USP Lompoc High 80 49 61.25%
USP Atwater High N/A N/A ------
USP Lee High N/A N/A ------
USP Pollock High N/A 16 ------
ADX Florence Maximum 4 7 175.00%
FCC Coleman N/A60 200 237 118.50%


Footnotes
  1. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2001 goals reported in the FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  2. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  3. The FY 2001 GED goals for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2001 GED outcomes were combined in a single FY 2001 report.